// security program reviews
Security ProgramReviews
A clear-eyed assessment of your security program against the frameworks that matter — NIST CSF 2.0, ISO 27001, SOC 2, CIS Controls. We score maturity across six domains and hand back an executive-ready, attacker-informed roadmap.
// what it is
Know exactly where your program stands
A security program review measures your organization against a recognized framework and turns that into something you can act on. We assess governance, application security, cloud, identity, detection & response, and vendor risk through interviews and hands-on evidence — then score maturity and deliver a prioritized roadmap. The goal isn't a grade; it's a defensible plan for where to spend your next dollar and hour. For organizations that want continuous guidance after the review, it pairs naturally with our ongoing security strategy advisory.
frameworks
- NIST CSF 2.0
- ISO 27001
- SOC 2
- CIS Controls
// what we cover
Six domains, end to end
We review the full span of a modern security program — not just the parts that show up in a questionnaire.
Governance & Risk
Policies, ownership, risk register, asset inventory, and the operating cadence that keeps security funded and accountable.
Application Security
SDLC controls, code review, SAST/DAST coverage, dependency and secrets management, and how findings actually get fixed.
Cloud Security
Account and tenant hygiene, IAM boundaries, network segmentation, logging, and guardrails across AWS, GCP, and Azure.
Identity & Access
SSO, MFA enforcement, privileged access, joiner-mover-leaver flows, and the blast radius of a single compromised credential.
Detection & Response
Logging coverage, alert quality, on-call and IR runbooks, and whether you would actually see an attacker in your environment.
Vendor & Third-Party Risk
Vendor inventory, due-diligence depth, data flows, and the contractual and technical controls around your supply chain.
// how it works
From interviews to roadmap
Scope & Framework Selection
We align on which framework matters to you — NIST CSF 2.0, ISO 27001, SOC 2, or CIS Controls — and the domains and business units in scope.
Interviews & Evidence
Structured interviews with engineering, security, and leadership, paired with evidence collection: policies, configs, tickets, and dashboards.
Maturity Scoring
Each domain is scored against the framework on a 0-5 maturity scale, grounded in evidence rather than self-attestation.
Attacker-Informed Prioritization
We weight gaps by real-world exploitability — drawing on our pentesting and red-team work — so the roadmap fixes what attackers reach first.
Roadmap & Readout
An executive-ready report and a sequenced, owner-assigned roadmap, walked through live with your security and leadership teams.
// why platformsecurity
A review that survives contact with reality
Mapped to the standard you answer to
Scoring maps directly to NIST CSF 2.0, ISO 27001, SOC 2, or CIS — so results feed straight into audits, board reporting, and customer security reviews.
Scored on what we see, not what you claim
Every maturity rating is backed by interviews and artifacts. No checkbox theater — the score reflects how the program actually operates.
Prioritized by exploitability
US-based researchers who break into systems for a living rank your gaps. The roadmap leads with the controls that stop a real intrusion.
Output a board can read
A clear maturity scorecard, plain-language narrative, and a costed, sequenced roadmap your leadership can fund without translation.
Our reviewers don't just read policies — they're the same US-based researchers behind our penetration testing and red team engagements. They know which gaps an attacker turns into an incident.
// deliverables
What you walk away with
// get started
Score your program. Then fix what matters first.
In a few weeks you'll have a framework-aligned maturity score and a roadmap your leadership can fund. Let's scope your review.